<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The shortest beta-normalizer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sneezy.cs.nott.ac.uk/fplunch/weblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=95" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sneezy.cs.nott.ac.uk/fplunch/weblog/?p=95</link>
	<description>abstracting the pain away</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 07:05:56 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Tromp</title>
		<link>http://sneezy.cs.nott.ac.uk/fplunch/weblog/?p=95#comment-15808</link>
		<dc:creator>John Tromp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sneezy.cs.nott.ac.uk/fplunch/weblog/?p=95#comment-15808</guid>
		<description>This is very neat! I have written lambda calculus reducers before that
would first translate into combinators S,K, then reduce those, and finally
convert the result back into lmabda calculus (which also involves applying
combinators to newly introduced variables), but I never figured you could
do this directly on lambda expressions.

Short lambda calculus reducers actually have an application in the
theory of Kolmogorov complexity, as I show in a paper
&quot;Binary Lambda Calculus and Combinatory Logic&quot; available from
http://www.cwi.nl/~tromp/cl/cl.html

With some luck I can use Thorsten&#039;s reducer to significantly
improve the constant 1876 in (one half of) the Symmetry of
Information theorem in Section 5.

Thanks, Thorsten!

regards,
-John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very neat! I have written lambda calculus reducers before that<br />
would first translate into combinators S,K, then reduce those, and finally<br />
convert the result back into lmabda calculus (which also involves applying<br />
combinators to newly introduced variables), but I never figured you could<br />
do this directly on lambda expressions.</p>
<p>Short lambda calculus reducers actually have an application in the<br />
theory of Kolmogorov complexity, as I show in a paper<br />
&#8220;Binary Lambda Calculus and Combinatory Logic&#8221; available from<br />
<a href="http://www.cwi.nl/~tromp/cl/cl.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cwi.nl/~tromp/cl/cl.html</a></p>
<p>With some luck I can use Thorsten&#8217;s reducer to significantly<br />
improve the constant 1876 in (one half of) the Symmetry of<br />
Information theorem in Section 5.</p>
<p>Thanks, Thorsten!</p>
<p>regards,<br />
-John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
